She looks like a human instead of a doll and I can see what went into the shot. How dare he!
That tear in the paper is destroying America. You can see the flag wilting over it, for fuck's sake!
He's been criticized for angles, focus, lens choice, lighting, showing the set, you name it. The technical criticisms in and of themselves are perfectly legitimate, to my mind: you're observing compositional flaws which remind you of rookie mistakes, and you wouldn't want it in your gallery because it looks sloppy to you. Their inclusion is a deliberate act of juxtaposition, not an unintended oversight; but this stroke is itself an element that may or may not appeal to you. It makes a statement, and you don't like it. Cool. This is what art criticism is all about - every artwork is a statement, an answer to the question of what statements are worth making, and that worthiness is exactly what you ought to be evaluating From dance to music to video games, high art gives you a contemplative experience that enriches your life - you are meant to walk away with a sense of the profound. This didn't do that for you, and you can articulate what you feel is missing, out of place, or handled poorly. Fair play to you.
That's not the kind of reaction I'm talking about.

