My new computer, which wasn't "supposed" to show up until the 16th, actually got delivered
today. Hooray! But now I'm moving everything over, which is gonna take for-god-damned-
ever. It's easy, thanks to the aptly named Easy Transfer, which more or less amounts to a magic spell: I wave my hands around and say, "You! New 'puter! Be
just like my old 'puter! Go!" But Christ on a bike, this spell has a long-ass casting time! I'm gonna be watching the progress on my
sweet fuckin' 23" monitor until the wee hours, and until then I'm instructed, "Do not use this computer during the transfer." Huh. I sure hope blogging and blasting mp3s doesn't count as "using this computer." :\
Anyway, I'm not up to any super-creative writing. I'd meant to write another vignette for
Tooth & Claw, I have it all planned out (more or less), but I just
can't stop wanting my new 'puter to be ready. So here are a few neat tidbits with no central organization. First, scientists are hard at work decoding the visual experience of dreams from brain scans.
Here's a link to one article, focusing mainly on Japanese research. And
here's another one from Gizmodo, focusing mainly on what's been done at UC Berkeley (with video!). An important note is that the constructed video is not a reading of the visual cortex, but actually a composite constructed from pre-existing video clips. I caught the headline over lunch in
USA Today (I think). Those articles above are just what I was able to dig up in two minutes, but I have some more to say below the cut.
Second,
here is a cool little infographic submitted to me by Allison on the visual IQ of Americans, showing how well (or poorly) we can identify certain people, symbols, and geographic regions on sight.
I was able to identify Boehner purely based on hatred of him as a person,
pick out the Euro, the Star of David, and the Twitter logo. That... was it.
Third, Amina Tyler recently went missing after posting topless photos of herself on the internet in order to show that her body was hers to do with as she chooses. The going speculation seems to be that her family kidnapped her, in direct contravention to Tyler's thesis, out of some bass-ackward idea of honor where "tits is bad" and it's somehow
less embarrassing to abduct a member of your family than to let her do her own fuckin' thing. Because Tyler's disappearance is probably going to be tragic, but it might not necessarily be just yet, (NSFW photos!)
FEMEN recently organized a load of topless protests at a bunch of European mosques in order to say, "You think
photos on the internet are bad? Wait'll you see this
all up in your fuckin' streets!" OK, I was paraphrasing there, but here is
an actual quote: "We're free, we're naked, it's our right, it's our body, it's our rules, and nobody can use religion, and some other holy things, to abuse women, to oppress them... And we'll fight against them, and our boobs will be stronger than their stones."
Actions such as this were described as "evacuating" protesters. Boy, those men
with truncheons sure evacuated the living daylights out of those half-naked protesters.
Fourth,
some scientists seem to believe that they're on the cusp of experimentally confirming the existence of dark matter, which would quite frankly be rad as Hell. What gives me pause for thought, however, is that they're looking at positrons in space - and positrons are
antimatter. The difference, briefly, is that antimatter is normal matter with its polarity reversed (protons become antiprotons, same mass but opposite charge; electrons become antielectrons or positrons, same mass but opposite charge). We use antimatter in routine medical procedures - the "PET" in PET scan stands for "positron emission tomography." Dark matter, on the other hand, is simply stuff that has mass and takes up space, but "doesn't shine" in the way that everything else in the Universe does - it's
there, it exerts gravitational forces upon whatever's around, but we just can't detect it since it's not shiny like "normal" matter. However, this positron/dark matter connection gives me faint and tenuous hope that
Douglas' exclamation that dark matter (rather than antimatter) cancels out regular matter is actually oddly prophetic rather than a stupid fuckin' typo on my part. Whatever, I'll probably change it anyway because I also have a few other infelicities to remedy for the next edition. They're the scientists, I'll trust 'em until I hear better. :)
OK, by way of wrapping up, here are some of my thoughts on the decoding of the visual elements of dreams.